For example, in the first six months of the Truman
presidency, which began in April 1945 after the death of FDR, the United States
shed 2.8 million jobs. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2.0 million
jobs were lost in September ’45 alone. Six days after the bombs were dropped on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Japan surrendered. One month later, In September, 2.0
million were furloughed. However, the economy created 611,000 jobs in the three
months that followed and postwar recovery was underway. In total the economy
added 8.4 million jobs and the GDP grew 61% during the Truman Presidency.
In a period well before ideological extremism Eisenhower
succeeded Truman. In the first six months the economy added just 350,000 jobs
and for the full two terms it added just 3.5 million jobs. GDP growth slowed
to just 39% for Eisenhower’s two term. After the dynamism of the
Post-World War II jobs machine under Truman, the “Eisenhower Economy” merely
hummed. Eisenhower, a technocrat more than an ideological force maintained the
forward momentum of social programs established under FDR and Truman, had two
lackadaisical terms, left the country hungry for younger, more dynamic,
leadership and paved the way for Kennedy.
The GDP grew 13% in Kennedy’s three years in office. In the
critical first six months of his administration the US economy created 234,000
jobs, a little less than 40,000 a month, but through the balance of his
presidency it added about 100,000 per month bringing the country back to the
dynamism of the Truman years, pretty much what he was hired to do. Job creation
was solid under Kennedy, but not what would be unleashed under Johnson. The
Kennedy Tax Cuts, which were relatively aggressive for their time and enacted
before protecting the narrowest sliver of the electorate was a Republican
obsession were actually approved by Congress in 1964, after his assassination.
Johnson in a little more than one term created almost 12
million jobs. The GDP grew 37% in the same period. Part of this legacy may be
the so called 1964 “Kennedy’ Tax Cuts. But with all the pointing back to Reagan
and Clinton as guideposts for the future, perhaps the Johnson administration and the Great Society programs enacted under him, not to mention the dynamic forces set free by progressive civil rights legislation are more instructive.
Poverty, in 1964 when Johnson declared a War on Poverty, had
declined to 19% from just over 22% at the end of 1959, leaving one in five
Americans on the economic fringes. In a burst of bureaucratic creativity and
legislative action not seen since the depression, and perhaps never to be seen
again, Johnson created the Job Corps, Head Start, the Vista Program which
encouraged young people to engage and work in underserved communities, and a
host of other programs. Medicare and Medicaid were enacted under revisions to
the Social Security Act in 1965.
In addition to 12 million jobs created and 37% GDP growth in
a little more than a five year period, the dramatic effect on Poverty was stunning.
By 1973 Poverty rates had fallen to 11%. Though the population of the country
grew from 1960 to 1970 by 20 million people, by the beginning of 1973, 17
million fewer Americans were living in poverty. Primarily because of Medicare,
poverty among the elderly has fallen from 28.5% in 1964 to around 11% today.
While it can be argued that the 1964 “Kennedy” tax cuts created a positive economic
environment for Johnson’s grand experimentation, the mixed bag of results in
succeeding years from Reagan (tax decreases;
spectacular job growth), to Clinton
(tax increases; spectacular job growth) to Bush (tax decreases; the shittiest economy in 100 years)
seem to indicate that other motivations take a part in dynamic job creation.
Whatever tax policies are enacted, the Johnson and Clinton years
make a case for policies designed to lift all boats. After nearly two decades
of hostility to programs which benefited the poor, under Clinton poverty
dropped from about 15% to about 11%. While Republicans point endlessly to the
hot-check economy of the Reagan years for job growth, Clintons job growth
numbers when taxes were higher are as good, and Johnson’s, especially
considering the size of the population at the time, are stunning.
Following is a basic primer of economic statistics for each
President since Truman. Take special note of ole Jimmy Carter’s stats. Better per
year job and GDP growth than either Reagan or Clinton, and unlike Reagan he did
not run up the national debt like a madman. A good way to F*** with your repub freinds I think is to ask them who had higher GDP growth? Carter or the sainted Reagan. Same with job creation per year.
Bush has the worst record since
Hoover. He is worse by far in this analysis than any other President. Since the
economic calamity came at the very end of his second term he has no one to blame but himself.
Obama’s record is not good at all, but the deep hole of the 3.8 million jobs
lost in the first six months of his presidency cannot be overstated, especially
since these job losses were on the heels of 3.6 million jobs lost in 2008. In
the Reagan recession-- which took place after Tax cuts were enacted by the way—2.8
Million jobs were lost in a 17 month period. Even as World War II wound down
the losses were not as deep. 3.4 million jobs were lost from March to September
of 1945, but in the following 18 months the economy regained more than 5.0
million jobs.
While an argument can be made that since Obama enacted substantive economic legislation in his first months in office the job performance should be all his, I think most reasonabale people can understand the effort to hang the entire mess around his neck is purely partisan. That being said, the following analysis also indicates that leadership matters. While I believe it is wildly unfair to judge the president from the vantage point of these past three years, I would still say that history will judge. When it comes to economic performance Obama has a long way to go. Going back to the point on poverty reductions under Johnson and Clinton and the corresponding growth in GDP and job creation, when was the last time you heard the president say something or suggest improvements in progams which serve the poor?
I am aware that some of the numbers presented are at some
variance to articles and information I have seen posted elsewhere. I have for
example seem Reagan’s job creation numbers touted as twenty million even though
that is not what the BLS says. Job growth refers to Non-Farm employment in BLS
nomenclature.
Truman
GDP Growth 61% Average Annual GDP Growth 6.4%
Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 8.4 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth 970,000
Job Growth
Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) 358,000
Job Growth
from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 10,953,000Average Growth Per Month 129,000
Census Year 1940
US Population 142 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.09%
Eisenhower
GDP Growth 39%
Average Annual GDP Growth 4.9%
Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 3.6 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth 447,000
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) 234,000
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 3,455,000
Average Growth Per Month 36,000
Census Year 1950
US Population 151 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.02
Kennedy
GDP Growth 13% Average Annual GDP Growth 4.3%
Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 3.5 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth 1,219,000
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) 861,000
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 4,112,000
Average Growth Per Month 117,000
Census Year 1960
US Population 179 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.07
Johnson
GDP Growth 37%
Average Annual GDP Growth 7.4%
Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 11.9 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth 2,377,000
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) 1,391,000
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 12,547,000
Average Growth Per Month 246,000
Census Year 1960
US Population 179 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.14
Nixon
GDP Growth 34% Average Annual GDP Growth 5.7%
Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 9.4 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth 1,682,000
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) Minus 1,337,000
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 6,661,000
Average Growth Per Month 99,418
Census Year 1970
US Population 203 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.05
Carter
GDP Growth 37%
Average
Annual GDP Growth 9.3%
Total Job Growth
during Presidential Term 10.5
MilAve Annual Job Growth 2,622,000
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) 546,000
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 8,994,000
Average Growth Per Month 187,375
Census Year 1980
US Population 226 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.08
Reagan
GDP Growth 63% Average Annual GDP Growth 7.9%
Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 15.9 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth 1,992,000
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) 1,120,000
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 16,509,000
Average Growth Per Month 171,969
Census Year 1980
US Population 226 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.08
Bush 41
GDP Growth 16% Average Annual GDP Growth 4.0%
Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 2.5 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth 636,000
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) 1,248,000
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 2,673,000
Average Growth Per Month 55,688
Census Year 1990
US Population 249 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.02
Clinton
GDP Growth 49%
Average
Annual GDP Growth 6.1%Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 23.1 Mil
Ave Annual
Job Growth 2,883,000
Job Growth
Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) Minus 434,000
Job Growth
from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 21,383,000Average Growth Per Month 223,000
Census Year 1990
US Population 249 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population 0.09%
Bush 43
GDP Growth 16% Average Annual GDP Growth 2%
Total Job Growth during Presidential Term 2.1 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth 43,750
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President) Minus 3,876,000
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term Minus 1,544,000
Average Growth Per Month Minus 16,083
Census Year 2000
US Population 281 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population Minus 0.01
Obama
GDP Growth 8.3%
Average
Annual GDP Growth 2.8%Total Job Growth during Presidential Term Minus 1.4 Mil
Ave Annual Job Growth Minus 427,692
Job Growth Handoff (1st Six Months Succeeding President)
Job Growth from Month 7 Of President Term to Month 6 of Following Term 2,486,000
Average Growth Per Month 73,118
Census Year 2010
US Population 308 Mil
Job Growth as % Of Population Minus 0.02
No comments:
Post a Comment