True or not the rationalization the President’s camp puts
forward is fine by me. They claim they did not want to get into a mud fight
covering ground that is already well known to the public. But let’s be honest,
the Obama team got their clocks cleaned. There is plenty of time for recovery,
plenty of time, to adjust to Romney’s careening, swerving, move to the center.
That being said one has to be impressed with what the
Republican Party has morphed into under the Romney Banner: Republicans are the Party of the Big Tent,
just look at all the Romneys they squeezed in.
After weeks of banging the $700 Billion in Medicare cuts--part
of Obama Care-- on the campaign trail, “Empathetic” Romney hit them again at
the debate. It’s not his fault the President did not clarify the situation with
his comments. If he did he might have noted that “Deficit Hawk” Ryan uses the
same $700 billion in Medicare cuts for deficit reduction in his plan. In one of
the night’s most disturbing moments the president once again failed to explain
to the American people exactly the deal he made and the resulting years of extension
in the program’s financial. Perhaps there was good reason for that. Many
economists believe that the cuts Obama included in his spending forecasts will
be untenable to hospitals and will be restored by Congress. That’s a little
dicey, but the Republican plan, as near as I can tell, is that they will
restore the cuts (“Empathetic” Romney) and also keep the cuts (“Deficit Hawk” Ryan).
What is unmistakable is that “Deficit Hawk” Ryan proposes
20% cuts in Medicaid, the Government Health Care program for poor people. Ignoring
poor people or worse has become totally acceptable policy. These are draconian
cuts which will affect the weakest, most elderly, and often times sickest among
us. The religious parallels are apparently lost on “Devout” Romney. The cuts are
unconscionable.
Emergency rooms do NOT provide Health Care, they provide
emergency medical treatment, and then send people home. Health Care is what one
gets with regular medical check-ups and visits to their doctor. I guess
“Empathetic” Romney didn’t know that.
“Empathetic” Romney proposes to maintain some of the most
popular elements of Obamacare, most notably the requirement that insurance
companies offer coverage for those with pre-existing conditions-- With
continuous medical coverage, i.e. no one who lost a job through this recession.
He brought this up at the debate. However, “Just Like a Liberal ” Romney proposes no
mechanism to pay for it, and basically refuses to acknowledge the deal that the
Obama Administration made with the Health Industry: You get more patients so
you can amortize costs over a bigger pool of healthier Americans , but you’ll have
to provide better service. Counter intuitively “Empathetic” Romney proposes
keeping some of the regulations but eliminating the larger pool of insured.
In the debate, “Populist” Romney portrayed the watered down
regulations for colossus banks such as Chase, judged as too big to fail, as “the
biggest kiss that's being given to New York banks I have ever seen”. Huh? You
have to wonder what “Bain Capital” Romney’s biggest contributors thoughts about
that:
Goldman Sachs
-$890,000; Bank of America -- $670,000; JP Morgan Chase $663,000; Credit Suisse
-- $554,000; Citigroup $418,000.
Obama had to be wondering-- I know I was-- “Will he say anything to be elected?” If so, how will
he govern? “Bain Capital” Romney proposes the complete elimination of
Dodd-Frank, the legislation which contains the offending “kiss”.
“Empathetic” Romney telegraphed his move to the center days
earlier, saying he would not suspend the visas Obama put into place granting
children of immigrants a reprieve from deportation. Previously “Joe Arpaio” Romney has said he
would see to it that college age immigrants are not allowed to get tax payer funded incentives
to attend college. I guess the goal being to keep 11 million immigrants in a state of perpetual povertry. “Joe Arpaio” Romney endorsed the right wing fantasy
“self- deportation movement, which suggests as the Washington Post put it that,
“that America’s 11 million undocumented immigrants would simply go home if
government made their lives miserable enough”. The liberal firebrand Newt
Gingrich called the movement an “Obama level fantasy”.
After the debate “Empathetic” Romney told Sean Hannity that the
“47%” comments made by “Rich Guy” Romney were “just completely wrong”. This
must have come to news to Hannity who has been defending the statement
outright, and has himself been making the case that Obama’s domestic agenda is
fashioned to buy votes with welfare and $125 per family monthly stipends of
food stamps.
For those of us paying attention, one has to wonder who is
this guy? After a season of bellicose and bitter dialogue which included
self-deportation, silence in the face unconstrained attacks on women, foolish
arguments about contraception, silence in the face of the right wing hordes,
booing gay soldiers, cheering the death penalty run amok in Texas, suggestions
amplified with hoorah’s from the crowd that people who get sick without
insurance should be left to die, the Republican candidate is finally moving to
the center.
Meanwhile, “I Like Cheesey Grits” Romney slyly runs a
whites-only campaign for the base that believes with all its heart that Obama
is a Muslim Socialist. Loose talk and
innuendo has lead between 25% and 50% of Republicans-- depending on which state
they come from—to believe that Obama is a Muslim. For those on the right that look to vilify a
billion souls for the political advantage they believe it brings them I offer a
single finger salute. If the worse they can do is accuse someone of being a Muslim, then I too consider myself a Muslim, and a Jew, and a Christian, and an agnostic, and an atheist.
“Cheesey Grits” Romney offers a dog-whistle campaign appeal for
angry whites and is built on distortions of the welfare work requirements and the
bill-boarding of the phrase “Food Stamp” president. These are tactics to de-legitimize
what Newt Gingrich recently said was “not a real President”.
“Crazy Ivan” Romney, zig sagging his campaign this way and
that, is confusing from both a political and as well as a governing standpoint.
At the debate, “Deficit Hawk” Romney says he will not pass any tax cut that
will add to the deficit. “Empathetic” Romney promises he will not cut taxes for
the rich, but will cut them for the middle class. We know "Cayman Islands" Romney does not "worry about the poor". “Crazy Ivan” Romney wants to cut tax rates by 20% across the board,
but can provide no measurable way to keep them from affecting the deficit or
siphoning vast fortunes off to those of already unimaginable wealth. He has
recently suggested that he will cut rates, but cap deductions, perhaps at a
relatively low level for the rich. That sounds a little like a combination of
“Deficit Hawk” and “Empathetic” Romney. However, “Cayman Island” Romney would
eliminate the Estate Tax, a huge gift to the wealthy and their heirs. In the end
he will either have to cut taxes less, get a host unpalatable spending cuts
through Congress, or run up the deficit. Since increasing the deficit is the
most politically expedient I wonder which way “Finger to the Wind" Romney will go?
On energy “Bain Capital” Romney wants to protect a total of $70
billion a year that Obama has proposed for elimination to the oil and coal
industries. In fairness, there is substantial Democratic opposition to these subsidies
in some states. Money tops principle on both sides of the aisle when it comes
to energy. There is no “Devout” Romney concerned about
the future of the planet . But, “Governor of Massachusetts” Romney issued a
72-point Climate Protection Plan. Alas “Bain Capital” Romney killed that guy,
and now denies the existence climate change.
“Empathetic” Romney say he loves Big Bird and Jim Lehrer,
but he wants to eliminate PBS funding. “Empathetic” Romney loves teachers while
his party tries to destroy by any means necessary the unions that represent
them. What might “Right To Life”Romney say he loves so he can justify his
proposed funding elimination for Planned Parenthood, something “Governor of
Massachusetts” Romney would not have tolerated. “Empathetic” Romney believes in regulation,
but he would roll back Dodd Frank and turn the EPA authority for the management
of our water supply over to the states (HR 2018 & HR 872).
No comments:
Post a Comment