Friday, December 28, 2012

Why, God

Why, God?

WASHINGTON
When my friend Robin was dying, she asked me if I knew a priest she could talk to who would not be, as she put it, “too judgmental.” I knew the perfect man, a friend of our family, a priest conjured up out of an old black-and-white movie, the type who seemed not to exist anymore in a Catholic Church roiled by scandal. Like Father Chuck O’Malley, the New York inner-city priest played by Bing Crosby, Father Kevin O’Neil sings like an angel and plays the piano; he’s handsome, kind and funny. Most important, he has a gift. He can lighten the darkness around the dying and those close to them. When he held my unconscious brother’s hand in the hospital, the doctors were amazed that Michael’s blood pressure would noticeably drop. The only problem was Father Kevin’s reluctance to minister to the dying. It tears at him too much. He did it, though, and he and Robin became quite close. Years later, he still keeps a picture of her in his office. As we’ve seen during this tear-soaked Christmas, death takes no holiday. I asked Father Kevin, who feels the subject so deeply, if he could offer a meditation. This is what he wrote:
How does one celebrate Christmas with the fresh memory of 20 children and 7 adults ruthlessly murdered in Newtown; with the searing image from Webster of firemen rushing to save lives ensnared in a burning house by a maniac who wrote that his favorite activity was “killing people”? How can we celebrate the love of a God become flesh when God doesn’t seem to do the loving thing? If we believe, as we do, that God is all-powerful and all-knowing, why doesn’t He use this knowledge and power for good in the face of the evils that touch our lives?
The killings on the cusp of Christmas in quiet, little East Coast towns stirred a 30-year-old memory from my first months as a priest in parish ministry in Boston. I was awakened during the night and called to Brigham and Women’s Hospital because a girl of 3 had died. The family was from Peru. My Spanish was passable at best. When I arrived, the little girl’s mother was holding her lifeless body and family members encircled her.
They looked to me as I entered. Truth be told, it was the last place I wanted to be. To parents who had just lost their child, I didn’t have any words, in English or Spanish, that wouldn’t seem cheap, empty. But I stayed. I prayed. I sat with them until after sunrise, sometimes in silence, sometimes speaking, to let them know that they were not alone in their suffering and grief. The question in their hearts then, as it is in so many hearts these days, is “Why?”
The truest answer is: I don’t know. I have theological training to help me to offer some way to account for the unexplainable. But the questions linger. I remember visiting a dear friend hours before her death and reminding her that death is not the end, that we believe in the Resurrection. I asked her, “Are you there yet?” She replied, “I go back and forth.” There was nothing I wanted more than to bring out a bag of proof and say, “See? You can be absolutely confident now.” But there is no absolute bag of proof. I just stayed with her. A life of faith is often lived “back and forth” by believers and those who minister to them.
Implicit here is the question of how we look to God to act and to enter our lives. For whatever reason, certainly foreign to most of us, God has chosen to enter the world today through others, through us. We have stories of miraculous interventions, lightning-bolt moments, but far more often the God of unconditional love comes to us in human form, just as God did over 2,000 years ago.
I believe differently now than 30 years ago. First, I do not expect to have all the answers, nor do I believe that people are really looking for them. Second, I don’t look for the hand of God to stop evil. I don’t expect comfort to come from afar. I really do believe that God enters the world through us. And even though I still have the “Why?” questions, they are not so much “Why, God?” questions. We are human and mortal. We will suffer and die. But how we are with one another in that suffering and dying makes all the difference as to whether God’s presence is felt or not and whether we are comforted or not.
One true thing is this: Faith is lived in family and community, and God is experienced in family and community. We need one another to be God’s presence. When my younger brother, Brian, died suddenly at 44 years old, I was asking “Why?” and I experienced family and friends as unconditional love in the flesh. They couldn’t explain why he died. Even if they could, it wouldn’t have brought him back. Yet the many ways that people reached out to me let me know that I was not alone. They really were the presence of God to me. They held me up to preach at Brian’s funeral. They consoled me as I tried to comfort others. Suffering isolates us. Loving presence brings us back, makes us belong.
A contemporary theologian has described mercy as “entering into the chaos of another.” Christmas is really a celebration of the mercy of God who entered the chaos of our world in the person of Jesus, mercy incarnate. I have never found it easy to be with people who suffer, to enter into the chaos of others. Yet, every time I have done so, it has been a gift to me, better than the wrapped and ribboned packages. I am pulled out of myself to be love’s presence to someone else, even as they are love’s presence to me.
I will never satisfactorily answer the question “Why?” because no matter what response I give, it will always fall short. What I do know is that an unconditionally loving presence soothes broken hearts, binds up wounds, and renews us in life. This is a gift that we can all give, particularly to the suffering. When this gift is given, God’s love is present and Christmas happens daily.

Friday, December 21, 2012

Outrage



The NRA finally made what it billed earlier in the week as its “contribution” to the post Newtown dialogue. In the face of protestors who accused the NRA chief of being responsible for “Killing Our Children”, Wayne LaPierre called for armed guards in “every school in this nation”. Beyond that he stonewalled on any restrictions or new gun safety measures. His only real anger seems to have been reserved for the media which he claims has it out for the NRA. He apparently cannot believe that millions of Americans are outraged at the death of 20 children not to mention the continuing atrocities committed with guns in cities and rural communities across the country. He is out of touch with the majority of Americans who hold all of those who contributed to these deaths in any way responsible.
According to the NRA’s own website, in recent months the NRA has supported:
Michigan
•Repeal of the handgun safety test currently required to obtain a purchase license
•Repeal of the requirement that local law enforcement agencies maintain paper copies of purchases
•Allow non-residents for non-contiguous states to purchase rifles and shotguns in Michigan (A major cause of trafficking is the ability of people from tough gun control states to purchase weapons in weak states and transport them)
Hawaii
•Allow chiefs of police to issue licenses to openly carry firearms
Ohio
•Modifies the definition of a loaded firearm in a vehicle. Currently, a firearm is considered loaded if a loaded magazine is present in the vehicle, even if the magazine is not inserted into the firearm.
•Eliminates the renewed competency certification requirement for concealed carry license renewals
As late as August the NRA was strenuously lobbying against proposed Senate Legislation to outlaw large capacity magazine clips. The NRA website referred to the Senate sponsors, Lautenberg (D-NJ), Schumer (D-NY), Feinstein (D-CA), Boxer (D-CA), Menendez (D-NJ), and Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) as the “usual suspects”.
The NRA is in the tank for the gun makers, and now millions of NRA members need to decide if they will continue to stand with their organization and those that manufacture military style weapons, or whether they side with those seeking to legitimately improve the safety of our children. After Newtown no one, not the NRA, and not any Federal, State, or local official can have it both ways. Those that stand for more guns, which will only result in more killing, must be acknowledged for what they are: (Political) enemies of peace and civility.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/put-armed-police-officers-in-every-school-nra-head-says/2012/12/21/9ac7d4ae-4b8b-11e2-9a42-d1ce6d0ed278_story.html?hpid=z1
See More


IF we let this moment pass, then shame on us. It is important to note that progressives have been fighting this battle all along. These gun safety proposals are not knee jerk responses to the atrocity, they were already out there before the killing and have only gained traction as a result of the images we have all seen. At the same time the NRA has been fighting hammer and claw against even the most reasonable restrictions, including the most basic gun safety proposals. Their goal is an armed and untrained population fighting “Bad Day at Black Rock” battles on every street corner in America. The battle never ends for them, because if it does, when it does, it will adversely affect the profits for their corporate masters.
Any suggestion to put guns in schools whether in the hands of teachers, administrators, or armed guards should be judged for what it is: A surrender to the immorality of the gun culture. Conservatives and Liberals who are opposed to the continuation of genocide in our cities, towns, and horrifically in our schools must take a stand and not allow ourselves to be sidetracked by petty political arguments. Now is the time to Stand and Fight!

The following Website contains contact information for the President, All Members of the House and the Senate. For those that have not already done so, please write your Senator and Member for Congress. Democrats should not assume that their elected Representatives are on the right side of this, or that they are properly motivated to vote for Gun Safety.

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

“Nobody knows the solution” is an “on the one hand, but then again on the other” sort of statement which sounds wise, but which reeks of foolishness.

There is no principle involved in standing on principle, especially for those that say that “Now is not the time”. There is, in fact, no better time than now to have an informed and enlightened debate about gun violence. Just today four more people were murdered and three policemen were shot. If we wait for a period of time when the genocide of gun violence in America has taken a pause we will wait till hell freezes over. A more specious argument cannot be made. The gunners among us made this same putrid argument after The Tucson shooting in January, the Aurora shooting in July, the Oak Creek shooting in August. The only case for this argument now, with 20 dead children the latest in this avalanche, is for the pure purpose of averting one’s eyes from the scope of the tragedy.

Some have suggested that murder rates are a fraction of what they were not so long ago. That’s true. The US murder rate in 2008, as reported by the FBI, was 4.8 per 100,000. That is down substantially from the peak in 1980 of 10.9 per 100,000. But today’s rate is about what it was during the early 1960’s. In short, beyond calming the streets of baby boom drug violence there has been little progress in creating a more sane and civil society in America. The suggestion that things are not that bad, and this is just an overreaction is repellant on the surface and not borne out by the FBI statistics.

For all the talk about guns and gun safety and even mass killings, the great tragedy of gun violence is largely endured by African Americans who make up 13% of our population but suffer nearly 50% of homicides committed by firearms. White Americans purchasing guns for home safety are largely feeding a paranoid reality which does not exist. Yet it is from these islands of safety that most of the recent mass murderers have sprung. The trend is further borne out in the numbers which clearly indicate that the number of gun owners is declining rapidly even as the number of guns owned is on a meteoric rise.

Beyond that we often hear that we really don’t know how to solve this complex societal problem. In both Great Britain and Australia public horror at gun violence resulted in near complete bans on privately held guns and the result is almost no gun violence. While it’s true that people bent on killing themselves will still find a way to do it, suicide rates are dramatically lower in Australia (14.9 per 100,000) and the UK (10) than the United States (20). The suggestion that a dramatic reduction of guns in society will not greatly reduce violent crime and suicide rates in just flat, plain, wrong. The problem in the US is that with 300 million guns in circulation, and a gun crazy minority, the aggressive actions taken elsewhere are nearly impossible.

The total civil disarmament solution is impractical and probably not advisable, but no one should pretend that we don’t know what works. Better we are honest and say, "Look, this shit happens", but too many of us want our guns. We might add that "A certain amount of child killing will have to be tolerated" so we can have our fun hobbies and cool toys. That, at least, would be honest.   

Some have claimed, with either stunning ignorance or willful contempt for the truth, that those who want to murder will do so even in a gun free country, but the murder rate in the US (4.8 per 100,000) is four times that of Australia (1.0 per 100K) and the UK (1.2 per 100K).

There is no scientific evidence that suggests that children affected by either autism or Aspergers, a disease on the Autism spectrum, which still leaves most as highly functioning members of society. Media coverage of this aspect of the case has veered between irresponsible and just merely ignorant.

On the other hand State spending on Mental Health Care has been cut dramatically since the financial crisis is of 2009. ABC News reports the following:

“Since the recession forced budget cuts in 2009, state general funding for mental health care has decreased by an estimated $4.35 billion nationwide, according to the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, which serves 6.8 million patients a year.

 “Since 2009 alone, 3,222 psychiatric hospital beds are no longer available to patients, and another 1,249 may disappear soon because of proposed closures, according to the association. That's about 10 percent of all state psychiatric hospital beds gone in about three years, said Dr. Robert Glover, the association's executive director…”

Funding is a huge problem. But in this case it can hardly be argued that resources were an issue. It has widely been reported that as result of the divorce settlement the killer’s mother, his first victim, received $250,000 per year in alimony and received substantial additional spousal support to care for her troubled son.

So yeah, I have an agenda. Let’s start by trying to be honest. Guns kill alot of Americans (way out of proportion to other developed nations), and a sizable segment of our population has a perverse attachment to them. Those who stand in the way of progress on this issue are the same ones that have stood in the way for decades. Gun makers getting rich on the sales of once esoteric military type killing machines have amplified their voices and polluted our politics, but generally the voices are the same. But if we are going to speak of agendas, let us be honest about that too. There is no bigger agenda than that of the NRA and its corporate masters. If one wants to raise objections to agendas raised at the time of tragedy let us understand that the agenda of the NRA is to maintain the profits for the gun makers even if it means sustained levels of genocide in this country, particularly among people of color.



Sunday, December 16, 2012

Rage


I rage at the senseless brutality of it. That America has tolerated similar incidents at movie theaters, churches and shopping malls in just the past twelve months, and really for decades, with no legitimate movement towards action only deepens the outrage.  

I rage at the White House Press Secretary, Jay Carney, who tells America that there is a time to discuss gun control, but “Today is not the day.” There is NEVER a good time, not after Columbine (1999, 13 dead, 21 injured), not after Virginia Tech (2007, 32 dead, 17 wounded) not after Tucson  (2011, 5 dead, Congresswoman Gabby Giffords shot) , not after the Aurora massacre (July-2012, 12 dead, 58 wounded), not after the shooting at the Oak Creek Sikh Temple (Aug-2012, 6 dead, four wounded) and not after a summer in Chicago which saw an orgy of gun violence and human destruction.

We can only hope God holds a special place in a burning caldron in hell for those that who suggested with near pornographic obsession that if only some of those in the theatre in Aurora, or the temple in Oak Creek, or the school in Newtown had been armed, there would be less carnage. The criminally committed enthusiasts who spout such bile do not see the problem as 300 million guns, and a shrinking but ever more gun crazy, paranoid segment of the population. To them the solution is 400 million guns, make that 500 million(!), and an increasingly ramped up paranoia, overlaid with a more resolute hatred of our neighbor. Let the friggin’ bishop, the doctor, and the teacher get concealed-carry permits and the problem is solved for these prophets of destruction.

In the name of all of those who have been lost, including as President Obama so eloquently stated those “on street corners in Chicago”, I rage at this President who has completely capitulated to the not 40 million, but four million member NRA. The President has been a coward on Gun Safety and has neither attempted to set the NRA record of distortion and malevolence straight nor taken practical steps to stop the violence which has taken more American lives in 2012 than were lost in Iraq and Afghanistan and on 9-11 combined.

The 26 Democratic House candidates, and the sole Senate Democratic candidate, Joe Manchin, who was elected to the Senate in W-VA, who accepted NRA money are a HUGE part of the problem and represent just part of the corruption in our political soul which wastes so many lives. They do not carry the gun, but they make it possible for madmen, criminals, and terrorists to gain easy access so they may do so. The money these Democrats accept is the reason there are 300 million guns in America, campaign funds  provided by people that actively feed America’s  paranoia and the protracted bloodshed which we now endure.


This is not bipartisan money, or even Republican money. It is hard right conservative money and it is in league with the most regressive, reactionary elements of our body politic. $600,000 of the money spent in this election cycle by the NRA was donated by Karl Rove’s unregulated Super PAC, Crossroads GPS.  

In the 2012 cycle, 90% of direct candidate funding from the NRA went to Republican candidates for the house and the Senate, and 95% of Super PAC funding went to Republicans. In total the NRA contributed about $1.6 million, and of that amount only about $115,000 went to Democrats. Among other candidates the NRA supported Richard Mourdock, who infamously suggested that rape was both “horrible” and something “God intended to happen”. This is the company kept by those on the right, as well as Democrats who take blood money from the NRA and its corporate masters, the gun manufacturers who sell $5 billion in weapons in the US each year.

The NRA spent $40 Million on issue ads which claimed erroneously that the President:

·         Planned to ban use of firearms for home defense

·        Ban possession and manufacture of handguns

·        Close 90 percent of gun shops

·        Ban hunting ammunition

It is specifically these scurrilous and dishonest campaigns which prevent real action even in those cases where most Americans agree. For example, the five gun safety issues below where even the majority of polled NRA members agree:

·        Requiring criminal background checks on gun owners and gun shop employees

·        Prohibiting terrorist watch list members from acquiring guns

·         Mandating that gun-owners tell the police when their gun is stolen

·         Concealed carry permits should only be restricted to individuals who have completed a safety training course and are 21 and older

·        Concealed carry permits shouldn’t be given to perpetrators of violent misdemeanors or individuals arrested for domestic violence

There are these that say these measures would not have saved a one child in Newtown. Do they mean to suggest that no child died because these measures were not in place, or that the children that did die had lives without value? Do they mean to suggest that the particularly destructive hollow point bullets used in Newtown ought to be permitted for the fun of sport? Or that the right to own high powered automatic weapons with large capacity magazines supersedes, as my sister a teacher said, the right for children to be safe in their classroom?  

I rage at the mother who brought those high speed automatic weapons into that home. For the fulfillment of her obsessive hobby, two dozen children are dead. For as clearly as she is victim she is also villain in this episode of violence.

In this crime something has been breached, but does anyone really believe this will end anytime soon? It enrages me to consider how soon it will be before we will all once again hover around our TV, and listen to the endless litany. In 2014 or 2015 America will officially become a nation with more guns than citizens. America and her politicians have neither the political will nor the moral courage to address the obscene levels of weaponry in our midst. Our elected officials stand powerless in the face of a few million gun zealots blind to the suffering caused by their obsessive hobby. Why would it stop? America’s mental health care system is clearly inadequate to the severity of need. What will change in that regard to make the killing stop?

Mike Huckabee and Bryan Fischer tell us if God had not been removed from our schools this would not have happened. What rationale would these religious men use to explain the mass shooting at the Sikh temple in Wisconsin? I wonder. Wrong God, I suppose. Whatever religion Huckabee and Fischer espouse I condemn it for it appears neither humane or wise.

Victoria Jackson, stupid-as-a-f***ing-Rock-bubble-headed-comedienne, tweets that “… the Connecticut killer [was] just doing what abortionists do every day?” “When you forget the TEN COMMANDMENTS, people, THIS is what you get” she says. As someone responded on twitter, is this what the parents get? I dare you to stand in front of one of those Newtown parents and spill your sewage. Tell that to the parents of Victoria Soto, the 27 year old teacher, who placed her body between “her kids” and the killer and died so others could live. She is a repugnant coward, pond scum, in a moral universe.

Instead of any urgency to address the obscenity of what happened that is what we get. 30,000 will perish in 2012 because of gun violence, including suicides, accidents and murder. Those of us who wretch in the face of it have two choices:   Hopelessness or abomination. I chose neither. I rage at all of it, not certain of change, but without acceptance or tolerance for the destruction in our community, or the stupidity, selfishness, or greed that allows it to endure.  

Friday, December 14, 2012

The Great Bank Robbery


On Dec-11, The Department of Justice formally settled charges with HSBC, the British owned mega-bank on charges of money laundering for Mexican drug dealers, violating US sanctions by doing business with known terrorists through suspect Saudi banks and outlaw regimes such as Burma and Sudan. HSBC agreed to pay $1.92 billion in penalties, which amounts to about one month of the banks 2011 profits. When measured against its annual income, $1.92 B penalty seems meager. However, the outrage is actually worse. The real penalty is only about $700 million. $1.2 billion is the estimated profits that were earned in the various transactions. Forcing a bank robber to return the fruits of his criminality can hardly be called a penalty. The Bank will not be prosecuted criminally, but the Justice Department held out the possibility that individual criminal charges might still be filed. Fat chance. This investigation has been going on for five years.

I had read bits and pieces about this over the years, but I missed the denouement of the grand prosecution until I picked it up on Matt Taibbi’s indispensable blog.


In the attached piece Taibbi goes into some detail regarding the truly hollow nature of the penalties HSBC and some of it managers will have to pay:

“So the executives who spent a decade laundering billions of dollars will have to partially defer their bonuses during the five-year deferred prosecution agreement? Are you fucking kidding me? That's the punishment? The government's negotiators couldn't hold firm on forcing HSBC officials to completely wait to receive their ill-gotten bonuses? They had to settle on making them "partially" wait? Every honest prosecutor in America has to be puking his guts out at such bargaining tactics. What was the Justice Department's opening offer – asking executives to restrict their Caribbean vacation time to nine weeks a year?”

Neither the banks penalties nor those levied against its managers are substantial enough in any way to in any way deter this sort of heinous behavior in the future.

The Justice department chose not to prosecute for criminality and not to send anyone to jail because they were afraid of the negative effect it would have on the financial industry in general and specifically that it might bring HSBC down. The concern was that if HSBC failed it could bring on another Wall Street crisis. What happened to the end of too big to fail? As the NY Times said in its editorial Too Big to Fail has morphed in to Too Big to Indict.

HSBC was caught laundering money for drug lords, stained, in some cases perhaps literally, with the blood of thousands massacred across Mexico.  

Taibbi: “The banks' laundering transactions were so brazen that the NSA probably could have spotted them from space. Breuer [The Assistant AG responsible for prosecution of the case] admitted that drug dealers would sometimes come to HSBC's Mexican branches and ‘deposit hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, in a single day, into a single account, using boxes designed to fit the precise dimensions of the teller windows.’

“This bears repeating: in order to more efficiently move as much illegal money as possible into the ‘legitimate’ banking institution HSBC, drug dealers specifically designed boxes to fit through the bank's teller windows. Tony Montana's henchmen marching dufflebags of cash into the fictional ‘American City Bank’ in Miami was actually more subtle than what the cartels were doing when they washed their cash through one of Britain's most storied financial institutions.”

In addition to HSBC, Credit Suisse, Barclays, ING Bank, and Standard Chartered, have all agreed to settlements for similar charges, each one for hundreds of millions of dollars.  By way of comparison in 2010 there were about 5,600 bank robberies across the country. The average criminal made off with about $7,600, for a total nationwide haul of just over $43 Million. FBI statistics indicated that about four in ten of the bank robbers apprehended had drug problems. Does anyone else see the travesty of justice when a dozen banks accrue billions through illegality, perhaps half or more in the drug trade, without criminal prosecution, while thousands of others, serve time, a sizable number of them to feed drug habits?

The six banks involved in money laundering represent only a partial list of the recent criminality we have seen in the financial industry. Between LIBOR (16 big banks rigging rates, skimming billions of profits) and Goldman Sachs (calling their own investment vehicles sold to an inspecting public “pieces of shit”) and now this the Great Bank Robbery is no longer a Western with gunslinger criminals. The Great Bank Robbery today plays on a recurring loop and it happens every time a multinational bank opens its doors for business. Bernie Madoff was a drug store stick up man compared to these guys.

Obama’s Justice Department ought to just admit they are in the tank for powerful interests beyond their capacity to manage or regulate. One has to wonder about the influence of Wall Street cash on these deliberations. Somewhere someone was whispering in Geitner’s ear. “This won’t be good for anyone”, they say. For the President’s apologists who see nothing wrong with his Super PAC’s taking unlimited and unregulated contributions during the campaign and now for the inaugural, we have to ask, “Is this the price for that?”

And remember this, after allowing HSBC to launder millions in obviously blood soaked drug money without bringing criminal charges, the Justice Department is still considering pressing Federal charges in Washington and Colorado, against those who would light up a legally purchased (at least in those states) and likely locally grown (i.e. not trafficked under threat of violence) doobie. Meanwhile America houses 2.3 million people in its prisons. With 5% of the world’s population, The US houses ¼ of the world’s inmates. While the banks help further the criminal enterprises that make it possible, and perpetuate the cycle, it is estimated that more than ¾ of those in prison require drug treatment. Treatment costs a fraction of what incarceration does, but for the drug gangs and now apparently the banks that is not nearly as profitable.

This all of a piece, the Wall Street Bailouts which included hundreds of billions for the banks, but somehow just couldn't seem to muster the strength to help any significant number of people on the edge of foreclosure. This is why the Occupy people for all their meanderings and hopelessly goofy rhetoric had it about right: The system is completed tilted now in favor of the very few and at the expense of the very many. Of course specific connections are tenuous and perhaps hard to make, but there is an astounding amount of smoke in the air. Because of near total reliance politicians have on deep pocketed connections to large multi-national financial firms, the whiff of corruption permeates everything aspect of our political institutions.  Citizens United exacerbates the problem, but it did not create it.

It really is a pitiful commentary, particularly when considered in the context of fiscal cliff talks, which for all the fancy rhetoric will at best lock in a 30 year long right wing march in tax policy which has slowly bankrupted government while showing little in the way of progress for the American middle class. Yes, the rich will take a trim on the edges, but even there we have seen what their well-funded and richly rewarded surrogates in Congress will do to fight that.

Corporations pay a much smaller portion of the nation’s total tax bill then they did 30 years ago. That won’t change. Reagan cut Capital gains taxes in half in the 1980’s. It appears unlikely that they will even go up in any consideration of any plan now under discussion. The middle class got hosed, but from Wisconsin to Ohio to Michigan Unions are the problem. It is a sick, disgusting, mess, and too many Democrats and too many liberals do not understand the role that the Democrat party including the sainted Obama have had in perpetuating and in some cases deepening the crisis. We are better than this, or we ought to be.

This is obscene, a Democratic Justice Department on the cusp of its second term hands out a slap on the wrist to a bank for helping to wash blood from the money generated by drug dealers because the offending bank was considered too big to fail, and so indict. Holy f***, how did we get here?


Saturday, December 8, 2012

China Changes- Part 2

I have been travelling to Asia, since 1985 and China since around 1995. I started my work in Asia about five years after Deng’s creation of Special Economic Zones in Shenzhen and other Chinese provinces. Most of the women’s handbags we bought were still made in China in 1985. By 1987, the changes taking place in China made it a necessity to do business in China. The import company I was working for at the time was slow to adapt to those changes and did not survive.

When I made my first visits to China, Deng’s revitalization of the Chinese economy was already underway for more than a decade. I wished I had seen those first years though many I have spoken to have told me they weren’t that pleasant. I can believe that. Some of the places I have seen-- even in the last six months—are still pretty rough. 

Since my first visit, which looking back I certainly did not comprehend in any historical framework, I have visited China something like 75 times. I spent a few minutes in one of the endless car rides on the last trip to China, which I just concluded, doing a back of the envelop calculation. I estimated that adding up all the trips I have spent more than a year and a half in China. Whatever my life is, whatever good I have done or failures I have endured or created, the ability to witness this change in this wonderful country is one of the most profound adventures of my life. I did not and could not shape history the way others did, I would only wish. But in my life I have been beyond fortunate to be a witness firsthand to so much profoundly historical change and in some odd way to call China, this country of such complexity and scope, such promise and decay, home.  

My most recent trip carried me from Shanghai to Yancheng to Yiwu in the North, then Shenzhen and Dongguan in the south, then back to Ningbo, Linhai City and Wenzhou (sort of in the middle), and finally back to Hong Kong. I tried to look at the places I visited in remember what they might have been like when I started my journey almost two decades earlier. During this most recent trip I travelled by bus, car, plane, and high speed rail. On previous trips I have traversed the country by ferry and regular train  as well, which pretty much rounds out the methods of travel available to a billion Chinese people. Not including the flight from New York I probably covered a couple thousand miles during this last trip. Truth be told I am sick of the travel now, and always, always, always, would prefer to be home with my family. But China has been part of how I earn my living, owing to the need to pay for schools, mortgage and food, God willing, I hope it continues for a few years more.

I am a novelty in many places I go. I have often been the only westerner in some cities I visit. So there is an element of circus act, a 6’2” freak in a nation of 5’8” men and 5’0” women. But on these last trips, when I have needed to so often find my way on trains, planes and automobiles, the Chinese I have approached have been unerringly helpful and kind. In Wenzhou the board at the Hi-Speed rail station said the train left on 4, but actually departed on 2. I would have never been able to get that without the courtesy of the middle-aged man who spoke not a word of English and did not even understand my apparently feeble pronunciation of the Chinese city, Wenzhou. He kindly read my ticket and walked me to the spot on the platform here I needed to stand, then walked me on the train to the car I occupied, which by chance was the same as his.   

Everywhere children smile and approach me. Though the parents are often reserved, the children speak to me, almost always in Mandarin which makes me smile, with enthusiasm and smiling faces of their own which are still etched in my memory. In Shanghai on a subway a few years ago, giggling boys about Ben’s age now, 14, asked me my name. I told them Michael and asked their name. One by one they all repeated the same name: Michael. Chinese with contacts with the West often adopt “English” names for ease of communication. I have met Falcon’s and Skye’s and Jerry’s. These boys understood the ritual but did not have an “English” name themselves, so they repeated the only one they knew: My name, Michael.

Truth be told the personal habits of some are repulsive to me. Others have noted the spitting and hocking which is common in public spaces, even on airplanes and buses. Beyond personal habit, I believe this is something that can be directly attributed to skyrocketing use of tobacco products. A few weeks ago it was reported that the lung cancer rate in Beijing had risen 56% in the last decade. Improved economic circumstances have made many vises considerably more available to Chinese people.

Medical care has improved dramatically for everyday Chinese during the period of economic opening.  Even though it has a ways to go when compared to what Americans might expect, the government guarantees health insurance for all. That is saying something in a country where more than 100 million still live on less than $1 a day. On World AIDS Day, Dec-01, the new Chinese Leader, Xi Jinping, made a series of appearances at which Chinese AIDS policy was discussed. The stigma attached to the disease in Chinese as elsewhere still lingers, but to a much lesser extent, and most Chinese officials especially at the national level seem to get that it is a requirement of good governance to address the suffering. Although the government provided health Insurance policies do not currently  cover AIDS medications that is something that is under discussion now, the government does provide antiviral medication at low or no cost and this includes to the 70,000 Chinese in prisons, where testing is mandatory.

Despite the AIDS policies which appear to bring the force of government equally to those caught up in the judicial system and those outside it, the Chinese justice system itself has decades to go to reach any sort of equilibrium. The death penalty is handed out with astounding proficiency, even for property crimes. Political activists in particular are treated in the harshest way possible. Stories of people being swept off the streets are common, and even reported in Hong Kong, now under Chinese governance. Recent stories in Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post indicated a wave of extra-legal kidnappings of protestors who made their way to Beijing to register complaints regarding local officials. Once there they were followed there by provincial law enforcement, detained and intimidated to relinquish their claims. Local Communist Party officials fearing for their careers because of such complaints are responding with extraordinary and even in China illegal arrests.

Government officials at the national level, and more acutely at the provincial and local level are subject to fervent political activity. The middle class is growing, gaining in strength and political awareness. People are watching, and they have expectations. This affects environmental policy, land use regulations, worker rights and worker safety, and political corruption. A member of Chinese Greenpeace was quoted in the China Daily newspaper regarding the Global worming Conference in Doha. Wiebo, a homegrown social networking site which is sort of hybrid between Facebook and Twitter launched in 2009, has over 350 million users. It is estimated that over 100 million items are posted on the site each day. Weibo, nearly impossible for the government to control, has superseded the highly censored state media as a source of information, particularly for a younger and plugged in professional class.

Government officials are exposed with some regularity through the Weibo site. The continuing scandal of Bo Xilai, the Communist Party secretary of for the Chongqing municipality, has expanded in concentric circles through the site, as those who supported the deposed official and those opposed release scandalous information about their opponents. Sexual indiscretions with young, shockingly so, women have surfaced repeatedly, most recently with actual sex tapes being released. In addition to Bo Xilai who was brought down by sexual indiscretion and scandal, including the murder by his wife of an English businessman, Time Magazine reports that Liu Zhijun, the former Railway Minister, Chen Liangyu, Shanghai Communist Party secretary and Lei Zhengfu, the Communist Party secretary of the Beibei district in Chongqing, Bo’s home were also implicated.

Lei was brought down after a tape of him with what was variously reported as a 16 or 18 year old girl surfaced. The person who released that tape, claims to have additional footage of at least half a dozen other government officials in compromising circumstances. Though Chinese censors are constantly making key-word searches to bring down embarrassing stories, the onslaught of 100 million posts a day is impossible to contain, and even when they do the Chinese public deletes the keyword and repeats the post, so that both the public and the censors are locked in a battle of attrition which the government cannot win. 

When I was in China, both the Washington Post and the NY Times Websites were blocked, but in a sign of the porous nature of things, some stories published by the Huffington Post which conglomerates stories from many media sources, including the NY Times were available there.  The Times in particular has repeatedly run afoul of the Chinese leaders and the 10,000-plus censors that attempt to protect it, by reporting on the accumulated wealth at the highest echelons of the Chinese Government, including the previous Premier Wen Jiabao. Recently the Times reported on the scandal which rocked the Chinese Government in September. Apparently a close advisor to the former Chinese President, Hu Jintao, who himself was a highly placed CP Member, a man named Ling Jihua, tried to cover up the fatal crash of his son in a Ferrari in Beijing in September. As always details, posted on Weibo, sort of snuck out, then were brought down by the censors. In an odd twist in this case, whoever attempted the cover up, posted on the dead young man’s Weibo site, the goal being to dispute the fact of the death.  

But Western news organizations including the South China Morning Post --which is by the way available in many large cities in China’s South such as Shenzhen-- picked up the thread and released details of the story. It is not clear  to what extent the Chinese public is aware of the specifics of all these stories, but any analysis of the circumstances in which the Chinese Government now operates would indicate the government is highly aware of the resentment the people have for corruption at all levels of government. The new Premier, Xi Jinping, a refugee of the Cultural Revolution, has indicated that he wants to run a more responsive, less imperial government. Time will tell if that will take place, and what that will mean for the West.

 While corruption is an endemic problem, and any real system of justice is still a more long term goal the astounding progress the Chinese have made in securing a better future for themselves cannot be underestimated.  Hundreds of millions have been raised from poverty. Though it is clear this has come at the great price of separated families, environmental degradation, and social upheaval, city after city reveals a relentless march towards social uplift and development. Conditions are often very difficult, and even dangerous. That said the characterization of slave labor it seems to me misses the mark quite substantially, ignoring as it does that astounding social progress that has been made.  Simplistic analysis based on the history of labor strife in this America holds very limited relationship to what has happened and is still taking place in China.

The Red Crowned Crane is China’s national bird, but the towering construction crane is far more ubiquitous. This is true in very single city I visited.  To be fair the development is still largely concentrated in the industrial eastern third of the country. But, that said, macro-economic circumstances such as lower labor costs, less provincial regulation, lower costs, and government investments and inducements are driving development slowly inland. The Chinese are investing in infrastructure in ways that American politicians dare not acknowledge. Spending on high-speed trains, green energy, better roads, more ports, schools, and water projects dwarfs what the US is doing. These investments as Obama has pointed out are critical to any country’s ability to compete in the decades ahead.

Despite of or because of the all the tough talk the Chinese currency the RMB has gained a considerable amount of value against the dollar, which should make Chinese Imports more expensive. And yet the growth in the Chinese economy has not been even marginally affected. I have to laugh when I hear politicians on either side of the aisle talk about getting tough on the Chinese.  I do think there is merit in taking trade cases to the WTO and under Obama the US has won a few, but the relentless march of progress in China will not be halted by such gnat bites.

This is not meant to suggest that US ought not to compete, or that it cannot compete with China, or that there are not legitimate grievances. I have seen with my own eyes the rampant desecration of American ideas and creativity. In Yiwu City there are literally a dozen stores with the neon glow of the iconic Apple logo lighting their entranceways. I commented on that to a friend I was travelling with hand was advised that there are only four legal Apple stores in the country, two in Shanghai and two In Beijing, making all of these shops purveyors of illegal copies of Apple Products.

Yet when it comes to trade, and most especially America’s ability to compete, what I do believe is that the simple solutions are no longer adequate. America it seems to me is too willing to complain about the external, sometimes with good reason, granted, and too unwilling to acknowledge our own internal weaknesses. When America accepts poverty in its midst, we lose the great abilities of those people to contribute to our future. This is especially true in education. For all the talk about failing schools, and there are issues across the spectrum, the real failure is the warehousing of or students and the acceptance of their lack of educational achievement. Americas waste the minds of millions of its youth with nary a thought to what it means to the nation. Middle class districts need to emphasize more math and more science, but poor districts need tools to rise above current circumstances in mass, and that as we know is just not happening except in enlightened exceptions.

Beyond education which I believe is the most critical element for our future development, America is falling woefully behind China in particular and I suspect other developing nations, in infrastructure development. America is in odd ways blessed by the utter malaise of more than a decade in Japan, and the economic upheaval in Europe, but is too bogged down in silliness to take advantage of it. When I visit China, travelling for hundreds of miles on their roads, and hundreds more on high speed trains, and then come home to America, I have little doubt which country is most focused on the future. The current argument on taxes for a small slice of the population would be laughable if it weren’t so completely indicative of how lost we are as a nation.

I visited Shenzhen about a week ago, and in the down town area I was in, the modernization which has taken place was mesmerizing. The city of 9 million is a wonder of technology and development. I was given a security pass in the high-rise building in which I had to meet a client. When I entered the elevator I was taken aback for a moment by the lack of buttons to the floors before I realized the pass I was given selected the floor for me, thus preventing me form wandering into an area that I was not authorized to be in.

In the plaza around the building coming and going were young Wall Street types, in small groups, no doubt trying to take into action what they recently learned at their team-building retreat. “Get Outside; Work together in leaderless groups; Bla, bla, bla…” They were all so earnest and young and vibrant, men and women alike clad in their conservative black or blue suits, all there to manage the billions of dollars available for investment generated by an economy now ranked second in the world. The parking garage contained a sea of luxury brands from BMW to Land Rover, to Mercedes, to Ferrari and Lamborghini.

Chinese influence extends well beyond their own borders wherein Africa, for example, they are the number one trading partner to dozens of countries. While Americans pat themselves on the back for their charitable largesse, the Chinese invest, and build. They even have their own version of the Peace Corp, sending young people across the continent to work and teach-- Mandarin. 

For anyone with eyes to see, it is so clear that global economic predominance will be won or lost on the field of ideas and education and shared national commitment. For all the corruption I really do believe that throughout the Chinese Government structure there are people and institutions committed to progressively providing for the needs of all of the people. As with the US there are pockets of deeply entrenched reactionary conservatism. At the moment the Chinese are blessed with much newly found and unspent wealth. Time will tell how they will deploy their resources, but America would do well to recognize the reality of the challenge they represent.

If Shenzhen is a finance town now, albeit one with a lot of manufacturing, in dozens of other cities I visited manufacturing in small businesses, 300 person or less facilities, is still what everyone is engaged in. Longguan township, part of the city of Ningbo, in the Zhejiang province south of Shanghai, is one of those places. I always think of Rod Stewart’s song, Dirty Old Town, when I see these places. Where the big cities of Shenzhen, Shanghai and Beijing though not really bilingual are really rather easy for westerners to navigate, factory towns like Longguan are much more difficult. There is no western food, and what there is a health concern. There are dusty, often dirty places, with piles of rubble, including decaying food, everywhere. Whatever waterways one sees call to mind the ubiquitous PSA with the crying American Indian looking over the despoiled countryside. I walked around Longguan on Sunday a week ago, made a loop of maybe 20 blocks. Even on a Sunday there was bustle everywhere. If the color of money in the US is green, in China blue trucks of all sizes from Moped driven minis to 20’ containers, represent the real color of wealth. Here storefronts are open air regardless of summer heat or winter cold. They would be sad little places, except of course they are the outposts of progress in the Chinese economy. There is relentless bustle, honking horns and traffic seemingly coming from all directions, encumbered by any rules of the road. I have ridden literally thousands of miles by auto  over the past year and it is truly amazing the circumstances under which a Chinese driver will cross a double yellow line.

On TV in towns like this there is no Western media, save the odd example of a channel called Fashion TV. There is no CNN or BBC, but there is this vapid channel which displays an endless loop of runway shoes and which advertises a brand of water called “Fashion”, and which says it is for “models and billionaires”. This I think is what the West offers in comparison to the industry and sacrifice of the Chinese. F***, it’s depressing. Besides me, locked in a prison of a hotel room with no English speaking person to talk or listen to, who watches this shit?  I had to laugh as I ironed my freshly sink-washed underwear in an effort to speed the drying process. Elsewhere across the dial I could have chosen soaps or dramas in Chinese which work off of one of the following themes: Chinese Yuppies, the time of the emperors, the great war which may be actually the war before the revolution. All are populated with impossibly earnest yet beautiful, always made up, Chinese women, even the war melodramas, which also sort of makes me laugh.

Young urban professionals live in large towns and small. Their uniform of choice is black from head to toe. I often laugh about Joe Strummers line…

“You start wearing blue and brown and you’re working for the clampdown..”

Strummer’s song was a challenge not to surrender to business, and bourgeois values. It resonated with the children of the middle class like me who had in many ways, ironically, already surrendered. Black was Strummer’s color of choice. I wonder what he would think about the endless file of women, aged 15 to 50, dressed in black sweaters, skirts, patterned hose, and boots. They present quite a fashionable appearance even in smaller less cosmopolitan cities, all mixed textures and form fitting, but there is a sameness about it that is dulling, which is what Strummer was getting at. Men are no different, though  fashionable would not be a word I would use to describe their apparel in most cases.  Here too black is the color of the realm, but often there are unfortunate choices of satin jeans or short silk socks. It is all like the women have figured out something that the men have only had a glimpse of. In the train from Ningbo to Wenzhou a young man sat across from me dressed head to toe in Johnny Cash black with a Link Wray haircut, pointy shoes, short nylon socks, and purple tinged spectacles. What a hoot…

A generation ago most of the factory owners in these towns set free by Deng were just steps literally removed from their peasant lives. The fathers build what they could with their peasant hands and rough personas.  They neither knew or cared about labor law or environmental degradation. They lived through both the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution and built the new China. Often times I suspected their children had no knowledge or respect of the past.  I remember meeting so many of them. I always can recall the image of what I referred to in this past as “Grandpa with two hot rod sons”. The boys neither cared about the business or the struggle to create it. I remember one meeting in particular as they fiddled with cell phones, their toys, while the father, hopelessly aged beyond his years-- bad teeth and scraggly beard on deeply channeled skin-- and I conducted business. It is that middle generation which is the heart of the corruption in China today.

Across China now there is a whole new generation of Chinese business leaders and politicians on the rise. For the most part these are college educated people in their 30’s and early forties. Their children are raised by their grandparents. Childcare except for those of extreme wealth is out of reach for most. It is in fact a nation of one child families. The psychology of single child families is so unique it will be interesting to consider the consequences of that development. Nonetheless, the government recognizing that the population is aging rapidly and actually shrinking in some urban centers is considering relaxing the infamous one child policy. 

The new generation of business and political leaders understand environmental regulation and the laws regarding worker rights. At their factories they have built water treatment plants to treat factory waste, and air conditioned worker dorms. Workers punch time clocks and overtimes rules are not abused. In the best of them worker dorms accommodate children, which is band-aid to a crippling societal problem, children of migrant factory workers left behind when their parents seek work in the cities. When I was there five such boys climbed into a dumpster and after starting a fire for warmth died of asphyxiation.

In one factory I visited the factory owner selected the best and the brightest of the factory workers and is providing extended education up to and including college with a mind towards retaining their best workers and building a long term shared  commitment to the factory’s success. As I walked the leafy factory grounds, and walked the factory l floor I was by chance approached by a reporter for China Radio International and was asked to give my thoughts. I told the reporter that I thought the factory was the future of China. And they are.

A couple years ago when I visited Beijing, I took a photo of a young woman wearing a T-shirt that read “Art=Resistance” while strolling the grounds of the Temple of Heaven and extraordinary relic of China’s Imperial Past. The image lingers with me now. This women and I were both tourists, though she was Chinese and I am not. She has aspirations for our country that I cannot begin to comprehend. I honor her commitment just as I do that factory owner with that magnificent facility on Yiwu. Ultimately there battle is not my battle, though I believe we share similar hopes and dreams for our children. As time goes on now and the weeks of travel extends to months and ultimately years, I feel the tug towards some distant future of which we may all take part.  This is a future where nationally affiliation perhaps matters a notch or too less, and being a citizen of the world carries more weight. I am of course, first and always an American, but I have spent so much time in China now, and have seen so much progress there, I find I have feelings for its people that are not dissimilar to those I feel for my own country. Just as I have looked in the eyes of my own children and the kids on 62nd Street and made my prayers for their future, I also now have the faces on the children on the subway in Shanghai and the hotel in Wenzhou to consider. The hopes, I think, are much the same.

“For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dream shall never die.” Ted Kennedy, 1980

January 8, 2013

Faceoff in Chinese City Over Censorship of Newspaper

GUANGZHOU, China – Protests over censorship at one of China’s most liberal newspapers descended into ideological confrontation on Tuesday, pitting advocates of free speech against supporters of Communist Party control who wielded red flags and portraits of Mao Zedong.
The face-off between liberals and leftists at the headquarters of a newspaper company in southern China came after disgruntled editors and reporters at Southern Weekend last week decried what they alleged was crude meddling by the head of party propaganda in Guangdong Province, which has long had a reputation as a bastion of a relatively free press.
The protesting journalists at Southern Weekend have called for the dismissal of Tuo Zhen, the top propaganda official in Guangdong province. They blame Mr. Tuo, a former journalist, for making a drastic change in a New Year’s editorial that had originally called for greater respect for constitutional rights. The revised editorial instead praised Communist Party policies.
A former editor with the Southern Daily group of newspapers, which includes Southern Weekend, said negotiations continued on Tuesday between representatives of the disgruntled journalists and newspaper managers and provincial propaganda officials.
The former editor, who asked that his name not be used for fear it could jeopardize his new job, said the talks focused on the protesting journalists’ demands that the paper’s managers rescind a statement that denied that Mr. Tuo was responsible for the New Year editorial and for an inquiry into the incident.
“They want that statement to be removed, and they also want assurances about relaxing controls on journalists -- not removing party oversight, but making it more reasonable, allowing reporters to challenge officials,” he said. “The other main demand is for an impartial explanation of what happened, an accounting so it won’t happen again.”
The former editor said a continued standoff into Wednesday could jeopardize the newspaper’s usual publication on Thursday. “In effect, it’s a strike,” he said. “It looks unclear whether it can come out on Thursday.”
Senior Chinese officials have so far not commented publicly on the censorship dispute at the newspaper, which has tested how far the recently appointed Communist Party leader, Xi Jinping, will extend his vows of economic reform into a degree of political relaxation. But self-proclaimed defenders of Communist orthodoxy who turned up at the newspaper headquarters said on Tuesday that they were there to make the party’s case.
“We support the Communist Party, shut down the traitor newspaper,” said one of the cardboard signs held up by one of 10 or so protesters who came to defend the government.
“Southern Weekend is having an American dream,” said another of the signs. “We don’t want the American dream, we want the Chinese dream.”
Some of the group held up portraits of Mao, the late revolutionary leader who remains a symbol of communist zeal, while others waved the red flags of China and of the Communist Party. Most of the party supporters refused to give their names. They said they came on their own initiative, and not at the behest of officials.
The dueling protests outside the newspaper’s headquarters in this provincial capital reflected the political passions and tensions churned up by the quarrel over censorship, which has erupted while Mr. Xi is trying to win public favor and consolidate his authority.
Hundreds of bystanders watched and took photos on mobile phones as the leftists shouted at the 20 or more protesters who had gathered to denounce censorship, and shoving matches broke out between the demonstrators.
At one point, leftists were showered with 50-cent renminbi currency notes. The “Fifty Cent Party” has become a popular term for disparaging pro-party leftists, who are alleged by critics to be willing to take 50 cents in payment for each pro-party message they send onto the Internet.
“It’s the only newspaper in China that’s willing to tell the truth,” said Liang Taiping, 28, a poet from the southern city of Changsha who said he took the train to Guangzhou to show his support for Southern Weekend, which is widely read nationwide.
“What’s the point of living while you can’t even speak freely?” he said.
About 70 police officers and security guards stood nearby. They did not try to break up the protests, but officers recorded them with video cameras and occasionally stepped in to stop shoving and fisticuffs. Later, the rival protesters broke into separate camps concentrated on different sides of the gate to the newspaper headquarters.
The protests at Southern Weekend broke out while Mr. Xi, the party’s general secretary appointed in November, has been sending mixed signals about his intentions. He has repeatedly said he supports faster and bolder reform, but on Saturday he gave a speech defending the party’s history and Mao’s standing in it.
The Central Propaganda Department, which administers the censorship apparatus, issued instructions telling news media that the dispute at Southern Weekend was “due to the meddling of hostile outside forces,” according to China Digital Times, a group based in Berkeley, California, that monitors media and censorship issues.
Both supporters and critics of Southern Weekend journalists have claimed that Mr. Xi would back their cause.
“I don’t believe that Xi is totally hypocritical when he talks about reform,” said Chen Min, a prominent former opinion writer for Southern Weekend who was forced out of the newspaper in 2011.
“The Southern Weekend journalists have said that they accept party control, but the question is what kind of control and how far should it go unchallenged,” Mr. Chen added.
Jonah Kessel reported from Guangzhou, China, and Chris Buckley from Hong Kong. Mia Li contributed reporting from Guangzhou, and Patrick Zuo from Beijing.
 

China Changes- Part 1


President Nixon’s plane touched down in Beijing On February 21, 1972. Deng Xiaoping was at the time working in a tractor factory, exiled there with his family during the Cultural Revolution. Eight years later Deng would return to power and unleash an economic engine which is now the envy of much of the world. Despite this period of internal exile Deng was with Mao Zedong, the Chinese Communist leader, from the first days of the Chinese revolution and the period of war that preceded it. Deng’s rise to prominence began after the cataclysmic starvation and economic failure of the Great Leap Forward in the late 50’s, which resulted in in the death of tens of millions of Chinese.

The Communists led by Mao came to power in 1949. Unlike the American Revolution which was initiated and completed in less than a decade, the Chinese Communists battled for power began in the 1920’s, was interrupted for about a decade to engage in the common battle of WW II in the 1930’s and early 40’s culminated in a Communist victory in 1949. Before the War of Liberation, China was ruled uninterrupted by a string of emperors going back to 1,700 BCE, a period of about 3,700 years. By way of comparison, the history of the English Crown stretches back to between 700 and 800 CE, which makes the history of the British Monarchy almost 2,500 years shorter than that of the Chinese dynasties.  

When Nixon came to China in 1972, Mao had been in power for more than 20 years. Although Western kids, opposed to the Vietnam War, were waving Mao’s Little Red Book of pithy communist blabber, the Chinese leader had at the time already been discredited even among Chinese Communists for more than a decade. The Great Leap Forward, initiated at the beginning of 1958, had been a colossal disaster. Mao, who was paranoid of foreign influence, engaged the entire nation in a simultaneous battle of rapid industrialization and collectivization of farming. A nation of peasant farmers who had worked out a barely sustainable and impossibly fragile equilibrium of self-sufficiency were organized into collectives. Simultaneously, in a move to rapidly accelerate steel production which greatly exacerbated the shift away from this fragile equilibrium Mao ordered that each collective develop backyard furnaces to smelt steel. To meet some of the production goals some collectives smelted the farm tools on which they relied for their sustenance. The results were disastrous. Western estimates are that somewhere between 20 and 45 million died of famine or disease.

A few years later, around the time Kennedy came to office, Deng was given some control over Chinese economic policy, and in a sign of things to come he was quoted in 1961 as saying in a speech on the reform of agrarian policy “It doesn't matter whether it's a white cat or a black, I think; a cat that catches mice is a good cat." Still it would take Deng nearly 20 more years to unleash what is today modern China.

Zhou En Lai, who secretly negotiated the details of the trip with Henry Kissinger, met Nixon’s plane. Zhou, who had been in the late 50’s responsible for the administration of the Great Leap Forward, had been at the center of political power near Mao for more than two decades. He was a well-travelled, cosmopolitan diplomat, with near unrivaled power in Mao’s inner circle.  Zhou was also a fervently committed Communist, who notwithstanding his battles to mitigate the damage of the Cultural Revolution, evidenced near blindness to the suffering caused by the policies he espoused. Yet he was more progressive than many of the others around Mao. 

During my recent trip to China there were many news reports regarding recent publication and availability in China of a book by Chinese Author Tan Hecheng titled “Bloody Myth: An Account of the Cultural Revolution Massacre of 1967 in Daoxian, Hunan”. The book was written 26 years ago, but has just been released now. It details China’s history during the Cultural Revolution. Many believe that Mao initiated the Cultural Revolution in response to his perception of diminished power after the Great Leap Forward. Almost all cultural institutions found themselves under attack. Teachers, artists, and intellectuals from across the country were sent into internal exile to “learn” the value of work in either grim factories or collectivists farms. Not only Deng, but China’s newly installed leader Xi Jinping were sent to internal exile, and it is commonly believed that Xi is responsible for the book’s publication.

In a move that would serve as premonition to the bloodletting in Cambodia, Chinese youth were organized into Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution. After mass rallies with hundreds of thousands in Tiananmen Square, they were sent into the countryside to wreak havoc. Millions more died, as children humiliated, starved, and killed the intellectual leadership of the country for the sole purpose of serving the desperate whims of the madmen Mao who was trying to retain his grasp on power while descending into madness. Of course the story of the Cultural Revolution is not only that of the madness of the leader, but if those around Mao who let it go on for so long.

It is this history that is now coming to light in China. Even today Mao’s image stares down across Tiananmen Square. While the History of the Cultural Revolution is for the first time becoming available in China, the Great Leap Forward is still off limits. Is this because the Cultural Revolution represents a failure of political power which directly affected some of those now in power, while the Great Leap Forward was a failure of Governmental control of the economy which continues to this day? In the English newspaper China Daily which covers the country cautiously, but with some complexity and insight, it is not unusual to see letters to the editor which extol the virtues of Maoist thinking, even in some cases for the furtherance of business growth. I find this really mind-blowing, but it does indicate the confusing time warp which forms the cultural foundation on which Chinese economic engine now generates such extraordinary wealth. 

As detailed vividly in Harrison Salisbury’s wonderful 1992 book, The New Emperors: China in The Era of Mao and Deng, Mao was already a very sick man at the time of the 1972 meetings. Elements of the murderous Gang of Four, responsible for the death of millions, and the near strangulation of intellectual progress during the Cultural Revolution, were still in place. With the exception of one meeting between Mao and Nixon which lasted about an hour, Zhou represented the senior elements of the Chinese government at all the other meetings.

Kissinger’s influence on the meetings cannot be understated. History would later record Nixon’s frailties, and the brilliant way the Machiavellian Kissinger exploited them. Perhaps Kissinger’s crimes cannot be compared to those of Zhou, but like Zhou his biography is splashed with the blood of innocents from Chile to Vietnam.  It would overstate the case to suggest that Nixon was already, perhaps under the influence of alcohol, talking to pictures. That would be just a year or two later. But the Great Opening was orchestrated at the most elemental level between Zhou, a dark prince of Chinese history, in partnership with the master of America’s dark political arts, Henry Kissinger. These were great, though not necessarily good men.

Nixon’s courage to seek an opening with China in the face of attacks from the American right makes this perhaps one of the most courageous of his career. The gambit, taken at the height of the Vietnam War essentially provided a practical, progressive, alternative to the nihilistic frenzy which still very much gripped the China for most of the previous decade during the Cultural Revolution. It may be one of the most profoundly important historical events of the 20th Century. For America it created a new relationship with China, while at the same time marginalizing and thus weakening the Soviet Union.

While it would still take four more years for progressive elements like Deng Xiao Ping and others to route the reactionary Chinese Communist party members completely and another two years for the formal economic opening to take place, the potential for what the relationship between China and the United States could become was unleashed at the meeting. Nixon & Kissinger’s move strengthened the hand of the forces in China angling for modernity. It is that modernity that now moves at a pace that most Americans can barely comprehend.