Sunday, August 17, 2014

What Else You Got?


The thing that gets me is the lengths we are prepared to go, and the money we are prepared to spend, to deal with the fallout of our dysfunction, without actually dealing with the problem directly or really even summoning the need to be honest about it. The US has spent billions since 9-11 arming local police with military weaponry, which this week we saw turned on multi-racial protesters demanding justice for a young black man living in what is “one of the most racially segregated cities in the United States”.


I have been struck by the response of people from around the world, particularly a man from Gaza who was photographed holding a sign saying: “The Palestinian people know what mean to be shot unarmed because of your ethnicity. #Ferguson#Justice.” Twitter has been alight with comments from Gazans explaining to protesters in Ferguson proper medical techniques for managing a tear gas attack. Things really got going from a perspective of media awareness when reporters from the Washington Post and the Huff Post were arrested and others from al Jazeera were gassed.  Nothing wakes up reporters to injustice quite as much as when an event when one of their tribe is mishandled.

Pundits will no doubt spend the days ahead parsing the events that led to this conflagration. We will hear many levels of sober dialogue about police and community relations. Hearings will be held about the militarization of police forces across the country. Questions will be asked about why a police force of 55, working in a community of just over 20,000, needed a military assault vehicle. I grew up in a town about that size, Streamwood, IL. I was thinking this week what it would have looked like to see an MRAP (Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected) vehicle headed down Parkside Circle towards Monaco’s drugstore. What was absurd is now real. Yet it seems we are not even capable of having a real dialogue about where we are and the problems in our communities.

We can start with the lack of a quality education. For all the talk about the failure of the American education system, the basic differences in educational opportunities between districts located in poor communities and those in wealthier ones are clear. It’s hard to listen to the debates between union types and so called reformer types, without wanting to ask the obvious question: “How can education ever fill the gap brought on by a home broken by poverty?” While it is possible for districts and schools to rise above the limitations of their location, it is so much harder when kids are not getting enough food, or of they reside in an environment of fear and despair, so that what we see in the mean is failure.  From the jumping off point of a poor education the most optimistic path leads to a poorly paying job. Too many do not even get that far.

The great disparity of both income and wealth between African Americans and whites and the divide in employment opportunities between the two communities is worse now than in 1960. With the collapse of manufacturing, income inequality is greater than 1960. While this statistic includes all races it has had an inordinate impact on communities of color who in the early 70’s were just starting to climb the economic ladder out of decades of isolation. Soon after America turned its back on the War on Poverty and programs they felt most benefited other communities. For a brief moment Dr. King, Bobby Kennedy and others shamed America into seeing ourselves as connected, then Vietnam, battles over busing, and targeted racist political appeals growing out of Nixon’s “Southern Strategy"-- which explicitly attempted to racialize poverty programs-- drove poor Southern whites to vote their racial animus over their economic self-interest. This is a pattern that continues today. How quickly white Americans settled back into our comfortable calculation of them and us.  From then on America surrendered its efforts to solve its problem with race, and the poverty that attends it, choosing instead to paper the issue over with fine speeches and a celebration of Dr. King on his birthday.

While it’s true that millions of people of color rose to capture some measure of the middle class American Dream, those that remain are poorer and more isolated in their poverty and neglect than ever. No amount of readings of the “I Have a Dream” speech has or will change that.

Most people know of the staggering number of young African American men under control by one means or another of the criminal justice system. The War on Drugs has turned the increasingly for profit prison system in America into a warehouse of young black and brown men.  Prison populations, which even through Jim Crow and legal segregation were majority white in 1960, have turned overwhelmingly Black and Latino.  Since more than half that serve time return after being released for another crime, the system has become a revolving door of despair, reaffirming a pattern of petty criminality and incarceration rather than breaking it. White liberals, like myself, have spent decades arguing with other white liberals about whether the criminal justice system creates the problem and how to measure the responsibility of the incarcerated, but no amount of research and debate has broken the cycle.

While some may have forgotten or simply chosen to ignore how the problems of poverty exacerbate issues within our communities, there is little doubt that there are two criminal justice systems, one for white folks and one for the poor minorities, two educational systems, two community development systems and so forth. Moreover, willful decisions were made. Robert Moses, the patron saint of New York City Parks, carved massive section of urbanized housing with highways and other development projects in such a way as to totally isolate whole communities. Nicholas Lehman, in his excellent book, The Promised Land, details the ways Richard Daley did the same in my beloved Chicago.   



Our schools and housing communities either never escaped or are returning to levels of segregation which were identified as totally unacceptable in 1965. Meanwhile in almost every public sphere a majority of the Supreme Court has taken the position that the battle is over, and in the case of the most extreme justices challenged whether it ever ought to have been fought in the first place. Apparently the good guys won on Voting, in Housing, Affirmative action. Everywhere. Game over, time to move on. Congress has abandoned any desire for governance. Politicians with national aspirations, even the President himself, are afraid to say anything about poverty or race. Every program is measured by its impact on the middle class. It is as if America has surrendered its willingness to address or even talk about the stain of our historical legacy- racism.

Class plays an increasingly important role in some people’s willingness to see themselves as different or better than their brothers and sisters. Well off and well-funded Conservative African Americans now roam the land waving their fingers at those less fortunate than they. We see an increasingly willingness for those that escaped the desperation of poverty to roll up the road behind them rather than encouraging a broader and more expansive effort to pave an even better road, both metaphorically and literally. Infrastructure spending has become a dirty word. Herman Cain ran an ugly campaign of us and them, blame game politics, before he imploded amidst a flurry of not ready for prime time behavior (“Uz-beki-beki-stan”), punctuated by claims of sexually inappropriate behavior. His 9-9-9 campaign was a naked attempt to exacerbate the transfer of wealth from the poor and working class to those already obscenely wealthy and absurdly powerful.

So then we come back to Ferguson, Missouri. Every act by the police and local officials has been and will continue to be minutely dissected. The local police are clearly a bunch of jackasses. In action after action they have shown their contempt for the community. After what we have seen does anyone really doubt a police officer in that department may have felt that almost any show of force would be justified, up to and including shooting a young unarmed man with his hands in the air? After calm is restored, the questions will remain. For these protests are about so much more than the isolation of the police from the community? If calm returns tomorrow, for what reason would anyone abandon their sense of despair? Does St Louis County have some new Fair Housing Plan in the works? Is some new approach to breaking barriers of race in achieving access to good schools being considered? Job training? Summer work programs for young people next year? We see the assault weapons and military equipment. We’ve heard the lectures about bootstraps. What else you got?  

Saturday, August 2, 2014

Israel and Palestine: Shared Tragic Loss


Yochanan Gordon is a zealot, made even more dangerous because he does not carry a weapon. Yesterday he wrote an Op-Ed, published briefly, but quickly withdrawn for the Times of Israel in which he concluded with this question:
“If political leaders and military experts determine that the only way to achieve its goal of sustaining quiet is through genocide is it then permissible to achieve those responsible goals?”

Gordon is a writer, a demagogue, not all that different than Dick Cheney, for example, someone who provides a rationale for others to fight and die.  Back in the old days when there was 60% to 70% support in the Occupied Territories and Israel for a negotiated two-state solution the big question was always whether or not those in favor of peace and reconciliation would be able to sustain their voices over the hopeless nihilism coming from extreme factions in both communities who do not see the other as even at the level of human. The brutality of bombs landing on hospitals, factories, power plants, schools, and homes we have seen in Gaza, matched equally with the inhumanity of 3000 rockets fired indiscriminately into Israel, has empowered the masters of war on while weakening the peacemakers. Gordon is just one example of it. Even if he represents just a tiny fraction of the thinking  in Israel, his position is so extreme it is bound to drown out others, in the same way that the Tea Party, all 20 or 30 of them in the House, is the only element of Republican Party that gets any ink in this country.
I posted this not only to criticize Gordon, though he is worthy of that, but also because I know there are people of good faith who lean one way or the other, but maybe do not understand or choose to acknowledge the extremism that exists in the side they support or the community they live in. Elements of both the both Palestinian and Israeli nations are worthy of condemnation in my view and there is precious little understating or acknowledgment of that. I understand that some whom may read this and respond by saying what Gordon wrote does not match the sins of Hamas, words not having the same weight as action. But I would ask those people would you same the same for the political leadership of Hamas cooling their heels in Doha. Aren’t they also one step removed from the actual carnage taking place on the ground? Does this distance give them the leeway to speak of the extermination of jews? Does the bullet hate? How about the rocket or the missile?  Or are they merely means by which hatred is expressed? The utter contempt for the sub-human nature of other?

For weeks we have heard how Israel is weakening itself in the court of public opinion or Hamas is being “brought to heel” like dogs by Israeli bombs. This is the classic analysis of power, but the real shift of power is away from those whether in Palestine or Israel who seek peace and reconciliation.  People are fighting for their lives so good polling is not available in Gaza and the West Bank, but we can be sure that support for a negotiated two-state solution is no longer anything close to previous levels.  How do we ask a father destroyed by the loss of a dead child in his arms, or a mother hunkered down in an air raid shelter as sirens wail and her children cry to seek peace?  I make no qualms about my belief that the suffering of Gazans is unimaginably, obscenely greater, but that said, which family ought rightfully to be expected to press their leaders to seek peace?
Through this week I have seen post after post from those who see this calamity primarily through the prism of their personal allegiance. As one might expect most Americans see Israel as the victim, and Hamas as the cause of every hurt, both those inflicted on Israel as well as the Palestinians. But in this amazing new world we live in those of us who care, can also tap into a social network site and see a multitude of comments that can give as perspective as to how others might view these events, people with different perspective and views than our own.

It is easy to tap into the hurt and pain on the other side of the crisis if you are so inclined. There are people of good will and honor all over the world that are expressing their support and honorable hurt for the Palestinian people. There is much righteous and well directed anger towards Israel which I share. Despite the inaction of totalitarian Arab governments fearful of political Islam, across the Middle East there are people speaking in rational terms about the pain they experiencing and the wrong they see.
If one dives deep enough and frequently enough, it is not hard to find Islamic Yochanan Gordons. Like him, all these people do is sit with their phones and type words, they do not carry weapons, and even their audience is for the most part their fellow travelers on Twitter or wherever. Judging from their pictures with their pink hair accessories or American themed t-shirts many of these people would never pick up a gun. Some of the most pro-Palestinian supporters I have seen do not live in the Territories. They are just angry and hurt and for their people, and so they perpetuate a rationale out of their bitterness, for others to fight and die, and in Gaza if we are to be totally honest, simply die. There are estimated to be 15,000 fighters in Gaza affiliated with Hamas or other aligned groups. Still some suggest ultimate victory over a nuclear armed Israel. This is such wrong thinking to the point of being delusional. I was reminded of Dr. King’s words prescient words posted on the MLK Center FB page this week, “The choice is not between violence and nonviolence but between nonviolence and nonexistence.”

Most of those committed to their rationale do not see any reason to question it. I find this particularly hard to understand coming from liberals, who in almost any other conflict would criticize any entity that used its overwhelming power so indiscriminately. (Too many centers of Palestinian survival have been struck now to call the Israel effort targeted. Dr Belal Dabour, a Palestinian Doctor @belalmda12 has provided a steady sorrowful representation of the ways in which Palestinian society is being systematically destroyed.)
Many of the liberals now defending Israel and attacking Hamas by practice and seemingly family history almost always stand for peace, often for the underdog, the weaker or more defenseless. But not now. Israel has, for a very long time, been one subject that deeply divides American liberals. Those of us who now criticizing Israel are often accused of being supporters of Hamas. I heard it on during a debate on TV again last night. It was no different in 1982, when Israel blundered out of anger and frustration into Lebanon, and pounded Beirut mercilessly for months. Back then I was in the audience when representatives of the Israeli group Peace Now, explained that Israel was violating international law, using white phosphorus and other anti-personnel weapons in an attempt to terrorize the civilian population. We were told then that civilians were trapped in Beirut. Similar claims are being made in Gaza. What place in Gaza is safe for civilians? How can Israel drop flechette shells on Gaza city?


Back in 1982 many of us felt then that what Israel was doing in Lebanon was wrong and tragically would not bring them closer to their ultimate goal of security. And then Sabra and Shatilla happened and militias working closely with the IDF massacred between 1,000 and 2,000 civilians, killing many as they slept. Where are we now 30 years after Sabra, Shatilla, and Beirut, incidents we were told would so shock the conscience as to require both sides to forge a new path? 95% of Israelis support the recent military invasion of Gaza.
Yet I say for supporters of the Palestinian cause, those that can only see Israel’s mistakes, are we to believe the entire nation of Israel only hates Palestinians? Are we simply to forget that a few years back nearly 70% of Israelis were prepared to sign off on a negotiated settlement which would result in a two state solution?

With Lebanon in 1982 those of us who dared raise a voice were criticized as being pro-PLO. It is pro-Hamas now, then it was PLO. There is a very good reason that this approach is so effective in silencing honest discussion, the deplorable record of the PLO then and Hamas now. Many people do not accept that some of us can support the Palestinian people, while condemning the leadership which precipitates crisis after crisis. The foolish claim that ultimate victory is possible that the PLO told Palestinians then, and Hamas tells Palestinians now is a lie, designed to distract from their own humiliation at the hands of the occupiers, and to maintain allegiances that for any sane person should have long since been extinguished. Some of us find it impossible to disassociate our humanity from the devastation we saw this week in a UN school being run as a shelter where the UN claimed that the IDF was advised 17 times of the coordinates.  To us when supporters of Israel defend the indefensible with “Look at what Hamas has done,” the words feel effortlessly Orwellian. So those of us who seek a path towards peace, even of those of us with some knowledge of history, and the pain of both sides, we have no place. We are simply defenders of Hamas.
Here's the full text of the deleted Times of Israel post backing genocide in Gaza


The Author of That Gaza Genocide Op-Ed Is Not Backing Down


Yochanan Gordon Apologizes for ‘Genocide Is Permissible’ Op-Ed


Belal:
I read your story about the wounded little boy asking for his father and brother. I have a son. He is nearly 16 now, but at that age he was a skinny little guy just like that boy. My heart is heavy for that family and for all those now suffering such loss.

I will continue to follow and hope that this madness is soon over. We pray for peace and your personal safety.